Wednesday, March 16, 2005
~ 9:49 PM ~
Local newspapers, as well as PRC ones, have been publishing articles regarding the addition of Jin Yong swordfighting novels in textbooks, both locally and in China. Many argued that JY's novels were fundamentally commercialised and should not be included. Only formal literature should be included in the syllabus. Some, like me, wished that such variety of works part of the syllabus.
Firstly, we can see the rapidly declining interest for the language itself. The main reason is not because Chinese is difficult to learn, or it is hard to remember, but more importantly, it is the works they have in the textbooks. If you were given pages after pages of 'formal literature' for your language(both chinese and english) lessons, you would be bored to death after 10 years of compulsory education. Hence, formal works should be left to the Literature lessons, while the commoner-type of literal works can be used as texts.
Secondly, the idea of compulsory 'formal literature' is itself an oxymoron. These 'high-class' literature are meant to be understood by few people. A forced interpretation onto the students will only result in superficial understanding of the texts. This will destroy 'formal literature' right from its roots, as the majority, which is interpreting wrongly, will overcome the right minority. As with Zen enlightenment, one cannot force 'formal literature' onto students. It should come to them voluntarily.
Thirdly, the writers of the articles have used Shakespearean works as a comparison to what the texts must be. However, does it occur to them that Shakespeare was also only writing scripts for performances. He uses new words(not allowed for us), supernatural themes (Midsummer Night's Dream, and still not allowed), and even racism ('prejudice' against Jews in Merchant of Venice, still not allowed locally). Probably the only purpose for him to write the works is for entertainment. Now, without the authentic interpretation of Shakespeare himself, we jump to conclusions about his purpose of including certain phrases or lines. Who can say that after 50, or even 100 years, the Matrix will not be the case study for 21th century Retro masterpieces? What is the definition of literature then?
High-class literati, listen! Although formality is an essential factor in the consideration of syllabus texts, we must also look at texts that are relevant and appealing. You can't serve everyone steak; some only go for chicken.
