Thursday, February 17, 2005
~ 9:42 PM ~
Who in this democratic society do not think that their views are just as important as any others? However, when it contradicts to what many others think, especially many other experts in the relative field, is the view still valuable? One in a democratic nation who thinks that tolerance should be shunned certainly would not have his view taken seriously by his peaceful contemporaries. If his ideas get anywhere extreme, the society will see it as harmful, and seek to overcome it, probably through law. So what do humans actually need? A heterogeneous group of individuals who are too arrogant to listen to his adversaries, or a congregating believers of a single destiny for their humanity?
